The Amerikkkan randomly calling me racist while being racist was fun if entirely unproductive. Same with the Canadian settler.
- 0 Posts
- 33 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: February 3rd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Westerners aren’t helpless innocents whose minds are injected with atrocity propaganda, science fiction-style; they’re generally smug bourgeois proletarians who intelligently seek out as much racist propaganda as they can get their hands on. This is because it fundamentally makes them feel better about who they are and how they live. The psychic and material costs are rationally worth the benefits. -Roderic Day
All the libs in the comments really living up to the quote.
You are referring to unarmed protestors against fully armed military, with tanks? LOL, aha. Damn those rioters attacking the military with their own blood, splattered on the square. Those demons!
They literally immolated and lynched military guards to start the riot. You are extremely fucking arrogant for how little you understand anything.
when I have facts and sources
Lmao. What you actually have is a chauvinist fantasy and an immense arrogance.
Can’t even take the slightest of critism.
you have provided no criticism just a vast misrepresentation of what I said and the events in question.
So, here is the difference of the searches that people did even back in the day, noticed the difference between the searches in Chinese VS the ones outside of China. Thus proving OPs and my point.
Again not what we were talking about he said there was no information implying and perpetuating the nonsense lie that the date/event is scrubbed from history which is factually incorrect in the same way saying Winnie the pooh is banned is factually incorrect.
The university course on your link is reframed, obviously. That is the whole point on censorship. I can tell by the other curses and the content that a lot of things are reframed as well. Again, there is reason why you posted a Chinese link in an English focused site. We all know how idealogues think.
Chauvinism.
Lastly, on this segment of this documentary, Tank Man, these Asian students claim to not even recognize the famous “Tank Man” when asked.
He’s famous because who he is and what he did are completely reframed in the west as some sacrificial martyr jumping Infront of tanks (generally with the implication that he was ran over) whereas in reality he was a random man who wanted the tanks to return to the square and was ushered off by passers by not really a revolutionary figure or particularly relevant to the event as a whole. You people are so insufferably arrogant your vision and imagination must be reality.
Rely in common sense comrade.
“Just believe the western propoganda”. I’m no comrade of yours you Hitlerite settler.
You know there are photos of the dead people right? And videos?
People die when rioters (whose leaders did interviews explaining their plan to incite massive violence and flee to America) clash with the military did I deny that? It was categorically not a massacre.
You know nothing about me.
From replying to you before I know you’re Canadian and a self proclaimed lib thus 90% chance you’re white thus a settler. So taking it all together Canadian settler shitlib.
Nice that you went and checked my history as to come up with something to side track my points. I am not sure if you are a CCP shill or just brainwashed in propaganda.
Again didn’t check your history we’ve simply talked before. Also holy chauvinism really reinforcing the whole settler shitlib. And it’s CPC not CCP.
Also, you are moving the goal post, friend. You told the guy you responded to that the Tiananmen Square masacre was not censored. It is.
Massive twisting of what was said. He said you couldn’t find any information when in fact it is part of the mandatory university course which is all I pointed out.
Again I must ask are you genuinely unintelligent?
Is it? It seems like the exact read anyone would have of what you’ve said.
While there are plenty of non-western liberal democracies, I agree with the criticism that they aren’t that democratic.
This one? “Oh other forms of democracy exist but they’re not real democracy”.
You keep saying that I can’t expect non-western countries to have “western” democracy. It sounds like you’re saying only white people can have democracy.
You have to be a troll. Western democracy is democracy in the loosest sense to keep acting like it’s the only valid form of democracy is ridiculous. I hope you eventually grow up.
Because massacre is poor categorization of what was a violent clash between rioters and the military acting as riot police. Like why pretend to be a leftists when you’re a Canadian settler shitlib. Clearly not very good at categorising things. Also when did I deny their were restrictions around what is a very sensitive event that had western backing? All I said was that it is taught about as part of a mandatory course at university. The idea it’s fully blacked out is western chauvinist fantasy and honestly not even a very creative one. You are not very intelligent are you?
You can join any political party you want in the same sense that you can work for any company you want in a Bourgeois society. That is, you can join if they want you to.
It’s good actually that capitalists, fascists and reactionaries are banned from grasping political power.
Either you do not understand what control is, or you refuse to acknowledge a class not mentioned in the writings of Friedrich Engels.
Yes obviously doctors and nurses are different classes just like principals and teachers. (Sarcasm)
My deal is that I’m interested in how a bunch of Communists convinced themselves to support undemocratic political structures. I have read some Lenin and Mao, but its not the same as engaging with people who really believe in it. We’re all people, and ones with ostensibly similar political aims, and yet we came to such different conclusions.
You skimmed Lenin and Mao have no real grasp on any of the fundamentals but think yourself a scholar hence you come to malformed conclusions that are unworkable and entirely detached from reality and struggle. If you actually studied Marxist theory and engaged with the reality and history of the struggles of the people you would likely have far less inane views and they would most likely line up with those who have engaged too. I also think you don’t really understand what democracy is as you seem to believe anything outside of Western style bourgeois democracy is not real democracy.
Also, you cannot find information about the incident while in China. Can personally confirm.
Yeah no information, it’s only taught as part of the mandatory “outline of modern Chinese history” at university.
Marx did an entire chapter on it in Capital Vol. 1. Tools and machinery that theoretically should be a positive for workers are instead used to exploit them further.
The present form of social media is not some neutral expression of “human nature.” It is the product of platforms designed under capitalist ownership to maximize engagement, advertising exposure, data extraction, and retention. That means the most emotionally provocative, addictive, rage-inducing, insecurity-producing content gets structurally rewarded because it keeps people scrolling.
Yes, adolescent minds are more vulnerable. Yes, social comparison can damage self-worth, especially among girls. But that does not refute my point; it supports it. Instagram does not simply “show girls images.” It ranks, recommends, amplifies, tests, optimizes, and monetizes content through engagement systems designed to put forth the most inflammatory emotionally charged content possible (bodydysmorphia tier influencers followed directly by weight loss drug ads).
Also scare mongering about “evil CCP surveillance” is fucking silly. Our government listens to and is accountable to us unlike your digital overlords.
It has been proven that social media damages teeneagers’s development and self-worth. Or anyone here is going to attempt to deny this?
This is almost entirely a side effect of social media being privately owned and made to be as addictive rage inducing etc as possible as it brings the most clicks and profit.
so why just not call em fascists
Well because the shoe fits and it highlights an interesting irony/hypocrisy of the Zionist project.
Justin is a supporter of facist state but not a direct fascist.
If you send millions in aid and weapons to Adolf Eichmann to implement his plan, his final solution so to speak, while endorsing his ideology, I have some unfortunate news for you about what that makes you. If you weren’t aware already (it’s more than just a supporter of X state).
So, a Zionist is the exact opposite of a nazi
Both extreme nationalist ideologies.
Both are expansionist.
Both promote othering certain groups as a common enemy.
Both are pro genociding the othered group.
Both support the idea of a chosen people who deserve to stand above the othered.
Really not seeing the exact opposite line you’re trying to push.
Edit:
11·3 days agoAlmost like context is super important. The Nazis annexing Czechoslovakia was negative. The allies annexing Germany was positive. Very very few actions have innate moral character. Like killing is bad but if the person you kill is Adolf Hitler it’s a good.
All the shitlibs are suddenly weirdly pro suicide.
However, a committee-based democracy with a ban on antagonistic propaganda does not sound promising.
Comrade Bordiga limits himself to upholding a cautious position on all the questions raised by the Left. He doesn’t say: the International poses and resolves such and such a question in this way, but the Left will instead pose and resolve it this other way. He instead says: the way the International poses and resolves problems doesn’t convince me; I fear they might slip into opportunism; there are insufficient guarantees against this; etc. His position, then, is one of permanent suspicion and doubt. In this way the position of the “Left” is purely negative: they express reservations without specifying them in a concrete form, and above all without indicating in concrete form their own point of view and their solutions. They end up spreading doubt and distrust without offering anything constructive.
Maybe they found .world libs so annoying, racist and the perfect mix of uneducated/unintelligent and arrogant that they see it as the perfect pro government radicalisation tool.