I wanna see him debate her

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    From a worldbuilding perspective it fucking sucks. Like if you’re going to build a strawman commie totalitarian state at least make it interesting.

  • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I started reading it a few days back. I am still struggling to read it. This guy Winston, thinks so highly of himself, and so lowly of others. He calls his neighbours stupid, them being transferred to a department requiring “less intelligence”, while not being able to string a proper sentence himself when writing. Also his violent fantasies when he first sees Julia. I don’t know whether I’ll be able to continue the story or not. As just a novel, it is so off-putting. Aren’t lead characters supposed to be relatable?

    • Four_mile_circus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Orwell was unable to conceive of computers or robots, or he would have placed everyone under non-human surveillance. Our own computers to some extent do this in the IRS, in credit files, and so on, but that does not take us towards 1984, except in fevered imaginations. Computers and tyranny do not necessarily go hand in hand. Tyrannies have worked very well without computers (consider the Nazis) and the most computerised nations in today’s world are also the least tyrannical.

      Wow. Asimov made some good points, but that one sure didn’t age well.